|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 189-195
Motives for participation in physical activity among libyan adults
Sami S Elmahgoub1, Hassan S Mohamed2, Abduladim A Hmmier3, Adel I Eltaguri4
1 Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical Technology, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya
2 Department of Sport Training, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya
3 Biotechnology Research Center, Tripoli, Libya
4 Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya
|Date of Submission||08-Jun-2021|
|Date of Decision||26-Aug-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||29-Aug-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||16-Dec-2021|
Dr. Sami S Elmahgoub
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical Technology, The University of Tripoli, University Road, Tripoli
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objectives: The study aimed to determine motives for physical activity (PA) participation in Libyan adults and compare motives related to sex and places of participation (indoor vs. outdoor). Participants and Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted. The questionnaire was adapted from the Exercise Motivation Inventory version 2. Six hundred Libyan adults (300 males and 300 females) were involved in this study. Results: In general, positive health, activation, and avoiding ill-health (4.83 ± 0.89, 4.20 ± 0.93, 4.09 ± 1.00, mean ± standard deviation [SD]) were the most common motives for PA participation, respectively, while competition, afﬁliation, health pressure, and social status (2.73 ± 1.29, 2.69 ± 1.21, 2.59 ± 1.29, 2.50 ± 1.24, mean ± SD) were the least motivational factors, respectively. In males, enjoyment, social status, afﬁliation, competition, health pressure, strength, and endurance were significantly higher (P= 0.017, 0.000, 0.010, 0.000, 0.007, 0.024). In contrast, activation, positive health, weight control, appearance, and fitness were significantly higher in females (P= 0.002, 0.001, 0.000, 0.000, 0.005). In addition, health pressure, avoiding ill-health, and positive health motives were similar in adults practicing PA indoor and outdoor. In contrast, other motives tended to be significantly higher in indoor activities. Conclusions: Motives for PA participation differ across participants' sex and places of participation among Libyan adults. It is crucial to understand the motives for PA participation to capitalize on the positive motives to increase their participation and enhance the positive effects of increased PA in the community.
Keywords: Exercise motivation inventory-2, Libya, motivation, physical activity participation
|How to cite this article:|
Elmahgoub SS, Mohamed HS, Hmmier AA, Eltaguri AI. Motives for participation in physical activity among libyan adults. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci 2021;13:189-95
|How to cite this URL:|
Elmahgoub SS, Mohamed HS, Hmmier AA, Eltaguri AI. Motives for participation in physical activity among libyan adults. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 17];13:189-95. Available from: http://www.ijmbs.org/text.asp?2021/13/4/189/332569
| Introduction|| |
Daily physical activity (PA) could be categorized into occupational, sports, conditioning, household, or other activities. It confers benefits to psychosocial health, functional ability, and general quality of life., A significant number of studies described an association of PA and general well-being, mood, and anxiety. PA also has well-known beneficial effects on physical health, such as a decreased risk of chronic diseases, and preventing age-related diseases and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) by reducing their risk factors. In addition, increased levels of PA may reduce the incidence of specific cancers, particularly colon and breast cancer. Exercise can improve blood lipids and adds an independent modest blood pressure-lowering effect in certain hypertensive groups.
On the other hand, physical inactivity is used to identify people who do not get the recommended level of regular PA. The inactive lifestyle consists of sitting or lying down with little to no exercise. Physical inactivity adversely impacts adult health, epidemiological studies during recent decades have indicated that physical inactivity is associated with increased incidence of a variety of NCDs. Indeed, NCD's are increasing at alarming rates accounting for 60% of the total mortality rates worldwide.
Despite regular PA's established physical and mental health benefits, people do not participate in adequate PA to gain these health benefits., Only about 20% of adults in North America, for example, meet basic PA guidelines for aerobic and muscle-strengthening PA., Also 59% of adults in Europe have never or seldom exercise or play sport, and 41% do so at least once a week. Furthermore, 18–47% of university students from different Arab countries achieved recommendation for vigorous and moderate PA depending on country and sex, and the PA recommendation was achieved more often among males than females.,,, Investigators try to find out why some people are physically active whereas others are not. Lack of motivation was considered one of the main barriers to PA participation.
Motivation is an inspirational drive that brings determination to do a task. It gravitates an individual toward a desired goal and is considered a psychological force that can reinforce action. The self-determination theory (SDT) stipulates that motives can satisfy basic psychological needs, such as autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which are critical nutrients for developing quality motivation and personal growth.,,,,, In addition, motives can also serve cognitions and emotions included in personal goals. For almost three decades, two distinct types of motivation have been of interest to researchers in psychology: intrinsic motivation (IM) and extrinsic motivation (EM)., Motives for PA have been theorized, considering the differentiation between IM, obtained or accomplished in practice, and EM received as practice-derived results.,
Research on participation motivation suggests that there are systematic differences between participation motives and some demographic variables. These include sex, age, country, and preference for specific forms of PA.
The present study aimed primarily to determine motives for PA participation among Libyan adults. We also investigated the motives for PA participation that best discriminated between sex and place of participation (indoor vs. outdoor).
| Participants and Methods|| |
Settings and participants
The study participants were divided into two groups (indoors and outdoors) recruited from three different areas in Tripoli, the capital city of Libya. Eligible participants included adults aged between 18 and 70 years. They were 300 males and 300 females. After ethical approval, managers of 3 fitness centers (indoors) and three recreation spaces (outdoors) were approached to use their facilities for recruitment. Participants' informed consent was obtained on basis of anonymous participation. Participants were asked to honestly respond to the Exercise Motivations Inventory-2 (EMI-2).
Participants completed the Arabic version of the Exercise Motivations Inventory-2 (EMI-2), a widely utilized instrument with established and acceptable psychometric measurements to measure different types of exercise motivation. The Arabic version of the EMI-2 was developed by Hashim Abdulla Al-Mousawi at the Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain. Briefly, the EMI-2 was developed for assessing participation motives to examine issues such as the influence of motives on exercise participation, how these motives might influence the choice of activities, how affective responses to exercising may be affected by reasons for exercising, and how involvement in sports activity might have a reciprocal influence on participation motives. This scale evaluates the predisposing reasons for the practice of physical exercise. The EMI-2 comprises 51 items that constitute 14 subscales: Affiliation, appearance, challenge, competition, enjoyment, health pressures, ill-health avoidance, nimbleness, positive health, revitalization, social recognition, strength and endurance, stress management, and weight management. Each item was answered on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all true for me) to 5 (very true for me). Subscales comprise 3–4 questions, with subscale scores obtained by calculating the mean for the appropriate items designated by the scoring key. Furthermore, we added 12 sociodemographic parameters to the EMI-2 (sex, age, occupation, educational level, and income adequacy). In addition, the question about the frequency of activity per week, duration of PA sessions, are they are regularly practicing PA, and the onset of practicing PA have all been added to the EMI-2.
Data synthesis and statistical analysis
Data analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics (Version 23.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The motivation score was calculated under eleven subscales (0–5 Likert Scale) to get an average score. A higher mean score closer to 5 indicates better motivation, while a lower mean score closer to 0 indicates not-so-good motivation. These scores were reported by mean and standard deviation. The descriptive parameters were calculated (mean, standard deviation, frequency). Univariate ANOVA was used to test for differences sexes and places of participation for each item in the questionnaire. Demographics (sex, places of participation) were the independent variables, and the 14 subscales were the dependent variables. Statistical significance was set at p<0,05.
| Results|| |
General characteristics of the study population
The age ranged from 18 to 70 years (33 ± 11.2 years; mean ± standard deviation [SD]) 64.6% of participants have completed an undergraduate degree and 35.3% have completed secondary school. On overage, 60% of participants started practicing PA recently (> one year) regularly. Demographic characteristics and description of the physical activity are summarized in [Table 1].
The physical activity motives in the whole study group:
In general, activation, positive health, and avoiding ill-health were the most common motivational factors and expressed as mean ± SD [Table 2]. The factors that were listed as the least critical motivational factors included competition, afﬁliation, health pressure, and social status, as shown in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Motivational subscales of physical activity participation for the whole sample|
Click here to view
Difference in physical activity motives between sexes:
Eleven out of the 14 exercise motivational subscales measured by EMI-2 were significantly different (P < 0.05). Male participants reported significantly higher motives for afﬁliation, competition, strength and endurance, and social status. In comparison, female participants reported significantly higher motives for internal motives (positive health and activation) and external motives (fitness, weight management, and appearance) [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Motivation subscales according to gender (males vs. females); *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01|
Click here to view
Physical activity motives in different places of participation:
Eleven out of the 14 exercise motivational subscales measured by EMI-2 were significantly different: between places of exercise (P < 0.05). Participants of indoor PA reported significantly higher motives for stress management, activation, enjoyment, challenge, social status, affiliation, competition, weight control, appearance, fitness, and strength, and endurance, whereas participants of both indoor and outdoor PA reported no significant difference in motives for health pressure, avoiding ill-health, and positive health [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Motivation subscales according to place of participation (indoors vs. outdoors); *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Most of existing research on motives of PA participation in adults was conducted on university or college students. To date, motives for PA participation were not examined among Libyans. The present study examined the motives and differences in PA participation between sexes and places of participation in Libyan adults. Overall, participants had both intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors for participation in PA. Positive activation, avoiding ill-health, weight control, fitness, and strength and endurance were the top motivational factors. These results are consistent with previous studies.,,, Which found that positive health,,, avoiding ill-health,,,, appearance,,,, strength and endurance,, and weight management,,,, were the top motivational factors in university students and university employees. We used the same instrument (EMI-2) to measure the participants' exercise motives. Further, the present study is in agreement with previous findings using a different scale to measure exercise motives PA and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS). They found that maintaining physical health, relieving stress, enjoyment, and appearance were the most common motives in college students. Previous work on older adults revealed similar results. van Uffelen et al. demonstrated that older adults were more likely to be motivated by factors related to health and well-being. They also suggested that preventing health problems, feeling good, and weight management were the three leading motivating factors for PA participation for women and men.
The present study revealed that males are highly motivated by affiliation, competition, strength and endurance, and social status. This finding is concordant with the previous work, which found that males possess a significantly higher IM.,,, Furthermore, our findings are concur previous studies that EMI-2 to measure the participants' motives for PA participation.,, For example, Egli et al. reported that males were motivated by strength and endurance, competition, and challenge. Further, Cerar et al. also reported that males are motivated by enjoyment, challenge, social recognition, affiliation, strength and endurance, and competition. Kilpatrick et al. also found that challenge, competition, strength, endurance, and social recognition were the main motives in males. Furthermore, Molanorouzi et al. using the PALMS to measure participants' motives for PA participation revealed that competition and mastery were the main motives for PA participation among males.
On the other hand, several studies found that females have higher scores than males for extrinsic motives related to PA participation regardless of the instrument used to measure motives for PA participation.,,,,, Our findings are in agreement with these observations. Weight management,,,, appearance,,,,, fitness,, stress control, ill-health avoidance, positive health, and nimbleness were the main motives for PA participation among adult females. Females in our study were highly motivated by weight control and appearance. Obesity is considered a major risk factor for many NCDs. Therefore, weight reduction should reduce the risk for developing these conditions and other risk factor of age-related conditions.,
The sustainability of an active lifestyle is strongly linked to motivational processes and environmental characteristics. For instance, it has been shown that the availability of PA facilities per se is not adequate to encourage people to embrace an active lifestyle. In addition, characteristics of the environment can influence PA behaviors by encouraging or discouraging a person from using the environment for PA purposes. In particular, it has been postulated that PA in the presence of nature, a practice that is also known as green exercise, can provide additional health benefits. In addition, it has greater value for preventing disease and enhancing health in the population. Further, there is evidence that people tend to engage in PA in green space and might be active for longer or/and at higher intensities in natural environments. Three levels of green exercise have been proposed. These are recreational PA, outdoor competitive sport, and outdoor adventure sport. Differences do likely exist between these activities due to varying costs, access to locations, required skills, and hidden entry requirements to specific green exercise activities. In addition, it is crucial to understand the types of activities conducted, the motivations behind the decisions to perform such form of exercise, and the use of these areas. The availability and possible wide range of outdoor PAs could have different motives to drive individuals to participate in a specific form of PA. Participants of this study used either walking, jogging, or running as a recreational form of outdoor PA in open-air spaces.
The present study suggests that participants in outdoor PA were highly motivated by positive health, activation, and avoiding ill-health motives. On the other hand, activation, positive health, avoiding ill-health, weight control, strength and endurance, fitness, and appearance were the main motives for participants in indoor PA. Existing research data have examined the systematic differences of motivational factors for PA participation in certain types of PA (sports specific). Nevertheless, data comparing different motives between recreational indoor PA (non-sport specific) and outdoor PA are limited. Our findings are similar to those of Calogiuri and Elliott who compared motivational differences between indoor leisure physical activities and green exercise activities (outdoor PA) within a national survey of Norwegian adults' physical activity behaviors. Participation in green exercise was linked with higher convenience, affective benefits, and long-term health motives. The study found that outdoor PA was not driven by external body-orientated motives compared to sport- and gym-based exercises. Furthermore, they observed that green exercise group tended to focus on more extrinsic factors such as natural surroundings. Participants driven by affective benefits from PA but not the natural environment were more inclined to conduct gym- or sport-based activities to obtain extrinsic benefits. Also, Fraser et al. compared motivational drivers between the different types of outdoor PA. In general, participants were motivated by intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors in all forms of outdoor PA; our results concur with their findings. Calogiuri and Elliott have recommended that future research into motivation in green exercise should consider whether motives are more intrinsic or extrinsic through psychological theories of motivation. Consequently, we examined motivation using EMI-2 based on SDT to ascertain the different motivational factors between indoor and outdoor PA. Our study revealed that indoor PA has significantly higher motivation (IM and EM) than outdoor PA.
| Conclusions|| |
The findings of our study suggest that vital motives for participation in PA are different across sex and places of participation (indoor vs. outdoor). Understanding the motives that influencing PA participation is critical for developing interventions and recommendations to promote higher levels of involvement and adherence to PA participation and maximize its benefits.
The authors would like to thank students from the physiotherapy department, Faculty of Medical Technology, the University of Tripoli for helping in data collection, and Mr. Hisham Abudarhibah from Tripoli Medical Center, for his technical support.
All the authors contributed to the study's conception, data collection and analysis, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Compliance with ethical principles
The Bioethics Committee at the Biotechnology Research Center (BEC-BTRC), State of Libya, approved the study. All participants provided informed consent before participation.
| References|| |
Allender S, Cowburn G, Foster C. Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: A review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res 2006;21:826-35.
de Hollander EL, Proper KI. Physical activity levels of adults with various physical disabilities. Prev Med Rep 2018;10:370-6.
Ströhle A. Physical activity, exercise, depression and anxiety disorders. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2009;116:777-84.
Reiner M, Niermann C, Jekauc D, Woll A. Long-term health benefits of physical activity--a systematic review of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health 2013;13:813.
Thune I, Furberg AS. Physical activity and cancer risk: dose-response and cancer, all sites and site-specific. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:S530-50.
Guilbert JJ. The world health report 2002-reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2003;16:230.
Waxman A. WHO's global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Response to a worldwide epidemic of non-communicable diseases. Food Nutr Res 2004;48:58-60.
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al.
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:1451-62.
Donnelly JE, Blair SN, Jakicic JM, Manore MM, Rankin JW, Smith BK, et al.
American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:459-71.
Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: Accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian health measures survey. Health Rep 2011;22:7-14.
Abolfotouh MA, Bassiouni FA, Mounir GM, Fayyad RCh. Health-related lifestyles and risk behaviours among students living in Alexandria University Hostels. East Mediterr Health J 2007;13:376-91.
Al-Isa AN, Campbell J, Desapriya E, Wijesinghe N. Social and health factors associated with physical activity among Kuwaiti college students. J Obes 2011;2011:512363.
Salam AA, Alshekteria AA, Mohammed HA, Al Abar NM, Al Jhany MM, Al Flah F. Physical, mental, emotional and social health status of adolescents and youths in Benghazi, Libya. East Mediterr Health J 2012;18:586-97.
Sharara E, Akik C, Ghattas H, Makhlouf Obermeyer C. Physical inactivity, gender and culture in Arab countries: A systematic assessment of the literature. BMC Public Health 2018;18:639.
Musaiger AO, Al-Mannai M, Tayyem R, Al-Lalla O, Ali EY, Kalam F, et al.
Prevalence of Overweight and obesity among adolescents in Seven Arab countries: A cross-cultural study. J Obes 2012;2012:981390.
Ball JW, Bice MR, Parry T. Adults' motivation for physical activity: Differentiating motives for exercise, sport, and recreation. Recreat Sports J 2014;38:130-42.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 2000;11:227-68.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-Determination Theory. Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development and Wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2017.
Vallerand RJ, Ratelle CF. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of Self-Determination Research. University of Rochester Press; New York, USA. 2002. pp. 37-63.
Frederick CM, Ryan RM. Differences in motivation for sport and exercise and their relations with participation and mental health. J Sport Behav 1993;16:124-46.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 2000;25:54-67.
Bergström E, Martínez MG. The Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions of Managers in Public and Private Sector Organizations. Umeå, Sweden: Degree Project, Umeå School of Business and Economics; 2016.
Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF. The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivation in education. Educ Psychol Meas 1992;52:1003-17.
Molanorouzi K, Khoo S, Morris T. Motives for adult participation in physical activity: Type of activity, age, and gender. BMC Public Health 2015;15:66.
Markland D, Ingledew DK. The measurement of exercise motives: Factorial validity and invariance across gender of a revised exercise motivations inventory. Br J Health Psychol 1997;2:361-76.
Egli T, Bland HW, Melton BF, Czech DR. Influence of age, sex, and race on college students' exercise motivation of physical activity. J Am Coll Health 2011;59:399-406.
Kilpatrick M, Hebert E, Bartholomew J. College students' motivation for physical activity: differentiating men's and women's motives for sport participation and exercise. J Am Coll Health 2005;54:87-94.
van Uffelen JG, Khan A, Burton NW. Gender differences in physical activity motivators and context preferences: A population-based study in people in their sixties. BMC Public Health 2017;17:624.
Cerar K, Kondrič M, Ochiana N, Sindik J. Exercise participation motives and engaging In Sports activity among University of Ljubljana students. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2017;5:794-9.
Sit CH, Kerr JH, Wong IT. Motives for and barriers to physical activity participation in middle-aged Chinese women. Psychol Sport Exerc 2008;9:266-83.
Dai Z, Ang LW, Yuan JM, Koh WP. Association between change in body weight after midlife and risk of hip fracture-the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Osteoporos Int 2015;26:1939-47.
van Uffelen JG, Brown WJ. BMI and longevity in women: A time for reflection? Maturitas 2010;67:294-5.
Calogiuri G, Elliott LR. Why do people exercise in natural environments? Norwegian adults' motives for nature-, Gym-, and sports-based exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:E377.
Shanahan DF, Franco L, Lin BB, Gaston KJ, Fuller RA. The benefits of natural environments for physical activity. Sports Med 2016;46:989-95.
Joseph RP, Maddock JE. Observational park-based physical activity studies: A systematic review of the literature. Prev Med 2016;89:257-77.
Fraser M, Munoz SA, MacRury S. What motivates participants to adhere to green exercise? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:E1832.
Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D, Dadvand P, Forns J, Plasència A, et al.
Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12:4354-79.
Roychowdhury D. Functional significance of participation motivation on physical activity involvement. Psychol Thought 2018;11:9-17.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2]